Our Verdict
Redshift pairs a vastly increased render speed compared to CPU based render engines with a full biased engine that allows for greated flexibility. All of which makes it a must-have for anyone in the CGI industry.
Why you can trust Creative Bloq
Everyone who creates 3D art knows what a time-consuming process rendering can be. But GPU rendering has revolutionised the CGI industry over the past couple of years. Redshift has become one of the most talked about GPU render solutions as it offers the flexibility of existing CPU based render solutions, with the speed of GPU acceleration.
The key to Redshift is that it's a biased render engine, meaning it uses techniques to 'cheat' how the image works – exactly the same methodology traditional CPU based render engines such as V-Ray use. Unbiased engines mimic the physics of light much more closely, meaning comparably much longer render times and potentially less creative options.
Until now, most popular GPU render engines have been unbiased, giving an exponential render time increase. The Redshift team have brought the grunt of the GPU to biased rendering, and it makes Redshift potentially one of the fastest and full-feature render engines on the market.
Speed means nothing if the usability doesn't match up. Luckily, this isn't the case; we tested Redshift with Autodesk Maya 2016 (it is also available for 3ds Max, and Softimage with C4D and Houdini coming) and found it integrated well with the host application.
Dedicated Redshift shader options, camera and render settings were all in logical places. Redshift supports Render proxies well and a full set of AOVs (render pass outputs) are available.
With IPR, Redshift allows either bucket or progressive rendering, which constantly updates allowing really quick iteration during look dev.
With great tutorials on Redshift's site, if you're used to working with other biased engines, Redshift is simple to get your head around and easier than most to use. Basic controls are well organised within Maya's render settings, or logically placed within an object's settings.
Redshift uses out-of-core architecture, which uses all the resources of the computer to render scenes – unlike many GPU render solutions which can only use the memory available on the GPU, meaning that no compromises for scenes are required. Redshift also uses all the memory on all the GPUs within a PC, even if they have different RAM amounts.
Animation and camera effects, such as depth of field, are available and work beautifully, which when the samples are increased, create a lovely rolling falloff, especially when used with the Redshift shaders.
Redshift scales well for freelancers or studios, as one comparatively cheap license covers one PC, and if that PC happens to have 12 GPUs in it the license cost is the same as if it had one, making it potentially more attractive from a speed and cost point of view than a CPU based render solution.
This is good as Redshift is addictive, and has the potential to become a dominant render platform for the rest of the decade.
This article was originally published in 3D World magazine issue 205.
Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
out of 10
Redshift pairs a vastly increased render speed compared to CPU based render engines with a full biased engine that allows for greated flexibility. All of which makes it a must-have for anyone in the CGI industry.
Mike Griggs is a veteran digital content creator and technical writer. For nearly 30 years, Mike has been creating digital artwork, animations and VR elements for multi-national companies and world-class museums. Mike has been a writer for 3D World Magazine and Creative Bloq for over 10 years, where he has shared his passion for demystifying the process of digital content creation.